23/02/2025
‘Christian Values, Grow Up’, Explained
I recently sparked some controversy on X with my view that ethnicity holds greater importance than values. Of course, I stand by my position, I’m right, but I want to explain why this perspective is necessary. Values don’t exist in the way people often assume, they’re inherently fluid and shift and change with time. What we consider British values, Christian values, or Western values today differs from what they were 20 years ago, and they were different, still, 20 years before that.
Building on that idea, these values are essentially personal opinions. If you gathered 100 people in a room, each person would likely have their own unique interpretation of what those values mean to them. While there might be some occasional overlap, overall, the differences would be significant.
If we were to become a minority in our homeland, “British values” could shift to include things like eating jerk chicken, playing music loudly on public transport, embracing gang culture, and twerking. You might dismiss this as absurd, but it’s a real possibility when a nation’s identity is based on such ambiguous concepts. In Birmingham, “British values” might mean eating kebabs, calling everyone “bossman,” and praying five times a day to Allah. My point is that no one can definitively define what any of this means—it’s all subjective and open to interpretation.
When I posted “Christian Values, grow up,” it stirred up quite a bit of outrage because people took it personally. But what are Christian values today? They’ve become synonymous with things like LGBTQ+ flags, moral permissiveness, and open borders. Many use these so-called values to justify allowing immigrants into our homeland. Consider this: half of Africa is Christian, does that mean we should open our doors to them simply because they share some abstract, ever-shifting values? Of course not, but many would argue otherwise.
Now don’t get me wrong, I have no problem with British Christians (not paper Brits), but when the values they adhere to are presented as essential beliefs in order to be English, I find this counter-productive.
As for British values, what exactly are they? No one can pin them down, and the reason is simple: they don’t truly exist. Values are essentially a reflection of the people living in a place, but that doesn’t clarify what they are. With at least 25% of the population being foreign-born, it becomes even more challenging to define them, creating obvious confusion and disagreement.
The ‘civic nationalist’ argument that anyone who adopts these supposed homogenous values is welcome, is absurd. Anyone can pretend to adhere to a set of fabricated values. Just sing “God Save the King”, drink some tea, and suddenly, it’s “fine, mate, you’re one of us.” It’s complete nonsense.
I recently had an exchange with Calvin Robinson, who suggested to be English is synonymous with being Christian, a claim I find utterly ridiculous. Our people existed long before Christianity, and we will continue to exist with or without religion. Today, Christianity is essentially an African religion in all but name. In the UK the churches are empty, the priests are embroiled in all sorts of vile scandals, and the people clinging to the faith are holding onto something that no longer aligns with their beliefs. It’s a sad reality, but people need to face it head-on. Would an African Christian living in a mud hut become English by simply relocating that hut to, say, Huddersfield? Of course not.
So, how do we define our people? It’s straightforward. We are an ethnic group. Our people share our ethnicity, our ancestors’ blood and bones are rooted in this soil. Yes, blood and soil.
At its core, our ethnicity is the bedrock of our identity and rests on the idea of continuity. A people, our people, are defined by their ancestral ties, language, and heritage passed down through generations. These elements rooted in blood, soil, and tradition are a constant, enduring through time, despite external pressures or shifts in ideology.
For nations with long histories, like our England, this perspective draws on the legacy of Anglo-Saxon heritage, and the gradual melding of tribes into a distinct ethnic group: The English. Such a foundation provides a stable, unchanging anchor, immune to the whims of political or cultural trends, repackage as values.
In contrast, there is the notion of values such as Christian, British or Western values as the defining feature of a nation. Proponents of this view argue that what unites a people is not their genetic makeup but their shared beliefs, ethics, and principles. Christian values, for instance, have historically shaped laws, social norms, and institutions in many Western nations, including England, since the conversion of the Anglo-Saxons in the late 6th century. Yet, as history shows, values are mutable.
The Christian values of medieval England marked by feudal loyalty and religious orthodoxy differ dramatically from those of the Victorian era or today’s secular, multicultural society. This fluidity proves that values can shift with the wind, leaving our identity vulnerable to reinterpretation or erosion.
Essentially, putting values before ethnicity has led to our decline, our demographic replacement, and ultimately, will take us to extinction as a people. For England to thrive and survive, we must prioritise blood and soil, not values and kindness. Our people are constant, and those abstract values that people push as a defining factor of a nation, are essentially, made-up terms to justify immigrants moving to our homeland and claiming our tribe as their own.
To ensure our survival as a people, we must move beyond the current narratives and confront the lies we’ve been taught. This may be challenging for some, but it’s essential for our future. Ethnicity must always take precedence over any set of values; whether British, Christian, or Western. These values hold no true significance, but our people do.
– – – – – – – – –
Please SUPPORT my work!
